I’m curious. What do I have, in my home today, that they didn’t have in 1940.
- 4 laptops
- 2 desk top computers
- various routing system paraphrenalia for those computers
- DVD
- VCR
- VCR Tapes (about 30)
- DVDs (more than I care to count)
- Books. Seriously, I think I probably have triple the books of the average 1940s family. I think they utilized the library more.
- Hundreds of yards of fabric (I no longer have more patterns than a human being should be allowed to see much less own!)
- Dishwasher?
- Toaster Oven AND a Toaster?
- Crock-pot
- Microwave (two of em)
- Air purifier?
- Water purifier?
- Kids? (I have nine. How many people had more than 4 or 5 at most?)
- We have 2 cars. I don’t think that’s unusual for then.
- Cleansers? Do we have more or less than they did?
- 3 sewing machines
- 1 serger
- 1 embroidery machine (I really need to sell this thing)
What is my point? Well, there is this old saying “Live within your harvest.” I love that saying. I love the reminder that we must learn to survive with what we have instead of borrowing against the future. Well, the same could be true of our homes. “Live within your domicile.”
I think I need a new catch phrase. Maybe I’ll make a new contest for that. What do you think?
Meanwhile, the idea is a good one. I live in either 1100 or 1240 sq ft. (Depending on whether you believe the deed to our property or the guys who poorly sided the house 20 years ago). Either way, it’s not a big house. I cannot exist as though it is! Did people over pack and over “organize” and over decorate their homes 60-65 years ago? Probably some did but was it as epidemic as it seems to be now?
Here is an actual living room from the 1950’s.

Here is one option for today in one style…

(Visit your local IKEA to purchase products above)
And for a different look- perhaps something more traditional and less “cottage chic”…

(See your local Pottery Barn for the items in this room)
Now, this isn’t about style. One person will be drawn to the pink and white while another will love the clean lines and earth tones of the last room. Still others will hate them both! My point isn’t about prefrences. It’s about the subtleties of the middle room.
That room is designed for storage. The ottomans store things, there are shelves everywhere, cupboards, the works. This is part of who we are as a country now. People don’t dream of a new dresser anymore. They dream of new closet organization systems and not just because they’re more efficient uses of space! Many people who talk about owning such a system ALSO HAVE THE DRESSER.
I don’t want to pretend that there is anything wrong with having so much. If you have the space to store it and it blesses you to own it, and you haven’t stolen it, or nearly as bad- indebted yourself at 21% interest in order to possess it, enjoy the bounty of your labors! Own fifty pair of shoes, thirty purses, or sixty scarves! I’m not preaching against ownership. I only wonder about that little space issue.
In 1950 the average home was 983 sq. ft. Today the average new single-family home is almost 2400 sq. ft. Don’t believe me?

There. And that’s from two years ago.
There’s nothing wrong with a bigger house either, I’d like to add. I wonder why our houses are bigger. Is it because of our exercise equipment, our media, our collections, our… The list goes on indefinitely and again, I really want to be obnoxious and stress, I dont’ care! Have 5000 sq ft and pack it out with everything you have room for in that house.
So what am I yammering about if not the stuff I seem to be attacking? (And i truly don’t mean to. Promise!) Vintimagery.
Look at that first picture up there. Do I like that living room? NO. I don’t like it at all. I am not so smitten with the past to assume it was always brighter, simpler, or more appealing to my design tastes. It wasn’t. That particular room is too sparse for my taste. I hate clutter but the only thing I hate almost as much is an ascetic feeling when I walk into a room.
I like both the bottom rooms (hence why I chose them over something more Victorian or more modernistic). The middle room is too cluttered for me but I could make it work with a few things removed. Those lamps would go, most of the pillows, all but one or two of the bottles, and the rug over the ottoman. I’d keep the blankets but store them IN the ottoman with one or two of the pillows. I’d leave space for my eye to rest in that bookcase and I would go nuts with that many patterns mixed.
I just realize, however, that we have more stuff than they did. We have more kitchen gadgets, computers, all the media stuff, video and board games out the wazoo, I won’t even go into the obscene amount of TOYS most American children own, and if you’re a homeschooler… WATCH OUT!
Which brings me back to the beginning of this ramble through my baffling mental processes. I live in this house. I am not moving. This kind of leaves me with three options in the realm of home keeping and decor.
- Live with status quo. My life isn’t awful so this is a valid option!
- Reduce my possessions to fit comfortably in the house.
- Both of the above AND adjust our house to accomodate the maximum the house can, well, house!
I think I’m going for number three. I need to decide what items I care most about owning and purge the rest. I need to think about the best way to store what I do own. In the end though, if I don’t have a home and can’t find a home for something, shouldn’t I be willing to either part with it, or part with something else that is taking up space where this item needs to reside?
The thing is, how do you do this without turning your house into that 1950’s sterile environment up there?
And what do you call the storage equivalent of “Live within your harvest?” Watch for a contest! I’ll make notecards of the logo up there as the prize!